-Refer to Adams
I've taken art classes, I've studied visual and aesthetic aspects of films, and I've studied "literary" art. And every single one of those subjects take on a different meaning of what "art" is. I can't exactly give a dictionary definition of art. I believe art is highly interpretive. I don't necessarily believe that art can be given a concrete definition. I believe everyone can have a different and their own definition of art.
To me, what art is, is purpose. I believe artists don't simply just "do," but rather create and have a view and meaning about their artwork. Art also must encompass aesthetic aspects. I would say art is a purposeful, crafted work with aesthetic.
I'm really open to the art field. I believe many things are a piece of art. A painting, a video game, even a computer I think is a work of art. There's a creator, and they have an end goal and purpose to the piece of art. It's rhythmic and technical put-together is a work of art to me, as it produces a working product that not only aids humans, but causes humans to think, challenge, create, and so much more.
My group and I agreed with Ernest Adams in the sense that art has to be "interactive, have content/a message, aesthetics, ideas, etc." (Adams) However, we also disagreed in his concrete answer. It's too black and white the way he puts limits on the video games as art. We believe that art is interpretive and can't have a clear definition, only to the one who is defining it.
Attached below is the YouTube link for my group's response; enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77eEFMkCu6o
To deepen my discussion further, I'll look at another definitions of art, not just Adam's.
Leo Tolstoy, a highly famous philosopher, stated in an essay that "Art is beauty," (SAI). To further this, he said that art is "1) The individuality of the feeling transmitted. 2) It's clarity. and 3) The sincerity of the artist - ie, the the degree of force with which the artist feels the emotion he transmits," (SAI),
I agree that art is beauty, or like I said, has an aesthetic. I don't think I can take any concrete object and say it has aesthetic. For example, I look at the white board in front of me right now in class and don't think that is art or has aesthetic. Sure, it's crafted, and has a purpose, and a "design" but not one that's art and that was contrived to be a piece of artwork.
He states that art is the individuality of the feeling transmitted. This I disagree with. I know that a lot of artwork transmits feelings, which is an aspect of art, not a definition, to me. Not all art to me transmits feelings. Like I said, a computer is a piece of art to me, but it doesn't transmit feelings. Art being clarity I also believe is an aspect, not a definition. Since I think so many objects and paintings and crafts and works of art as a whole are so differentiated, not all are clarity. Though I stated that art has purpose, sometimes it can be interpreted differently from the artist and the observer/user. To the user, it may not be as clear like to the artist and vice versa. And lastly, art is the sincerity of the artist I agree with to an extent. The sincerity to me is the meaning and purpose or emotion the artist wants to transmit or convey, but not every artwork may have an emotion.
Now with using a philosopher's definition, my definition, and a scholar on digital games' definition, I want to focus on "are digital games art?" a little bit more. My answer is that yes, they are art. They (at least that I know of) have a purpose to the game, some sort of end goal, and they have aesthetics. They're digitally constructed and it takes a lot of effort to make them into a certain medium. No, not all may transmit emotion to the user or viewer, but does that not make it art? It was crafted and therefore to me is art. The fact that some games do comment on political or social issues or values like the game Postal gives it even more of a purpose, not just the shooting and the actual game, but the aim to make a satire of the events that went on.
Works Cited:
"Art Essays: The Meaning of Art as Viewed by Various Philosophers." Society for Art of Imagination (SAI). Society for Art of Imagination, 1 Jan. 2007. Web. 10 Nov. 2014. <http://www.artofimagination.org/Pages/ArtEss.html>.
Ernest W. Adams (2007) “Will Computer Games Ever Be a Legitimate Art Form?”. In Clarke and Mitchell (eds), Videogames and Art, 255-264.